Legislature(2017 - 2018)
2018-05-04 House Journal
Full Journal pdf2018-05-04 House Journal Page 3574 HB 260 The following was read the second time: HOUSE BILL NO. 260 "An Act relating to electronic possession of certain licenses, tags, and identification cards issued by the Department of Fish and Game; and providing for an effective date." with the: Journal Page FSH RPT 6DP 2573 FN1: ZERO(DFG) 2574 RES RPT CS(RES) NT 5DP 2NR 3066 FN1: ZERO(DFG) 3067 FIN RPT CS(FIN) NT 9DP 3334 FN1: ZERO(DFG) 3335 Representative Tuck moved and asked unanimous consent that the following committee substitute be adopted in lieu of the original bill: CS FOR HOUSE BILL NO. 260(FIN) "An Act relating to possession of certain licenses, tags, and permits issued by the Department of Fish and Game; and providing for an effective date." There being no objection, it was so ordered. Amendment No. 1 was offered by Representative Saddler: Page 2, line 3: Delete "90" Insert "30" Representative Saddler moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 1 be adopted. 2018-05-04 House Journal Page 3575 Representative Gara objected. **The presence of Representative Chenault was noted. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 1 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSHB 260(FIN) Second Reading Amendment No. 1 YEAS: 28 NAYS: 9 EXCUSED: 2 ABSENT: 1 Yeas: Birch, Chenault, Claman, Edgmon, Johnson, Johnston, Josephson, Kito, Knopp, Kopp, Kreiss-Tomkins, LeDoux, Millett, Pruitt, Rauscher, Reinbold, Saddler, Seaton, Spohnholz, Stutes, Sullivan-Leonard, Talerico, Tarr, Thompson, Tilton, Wilson, Wool, Zulkosky Nays: Drummond, Eastman, Foster, Gara, Guttenberg, Kawasaki, Lincoln, Parish, Tuck Excused: Grenn, Neuman Absent: Ortiz And so, Amendment No. 1 was adopted. Representative Tuck moved and asked unanimous consent that CSHB 260(FIN) am be considered engrossed, advanced to third reading, and placed on final passage. There being no objection, it was so ordered. CSHB 260(FIN) am was read the third time. The question being: "Shall CSHB 260(FIN) am pass the House?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSHB 260(FIN) am Third Reading Final Passage YEAS: 37 NAYS: 0 EXCUSED: 2 ABSENT: 1 Yeas: Birch, Chenault, Claman, Drummond, Eastman, Edgmon, Foster, Gara, Guttenberg, Johnson, Johnston, Josephson, Kawasaki, 2018-05-04 House Journal Page 3576 Kito, Knopp, Kopp, LeDoux, Lincoln, Millett, Ortiz, Parish, Pruitt, Rauscher, Reinbold, Saddler, Seaton, Spohnholz, Stutes, Sullivan-Leonard, Talerico, Tarr, Thompson, Tilton, Tuck, Wilson, Wool, Zulkosky Excused: Grenn, Neuman Absent: Kreiss-Tomkins And so, CSHB 260(FIN) am passed the House. Representative Tuck moved and asked unanimous consent that the roll call on the passage of the bill be considered the roll call on the effective date clause. There being no objection, it was so ordered. CSHB 260(FIN) am was referred to the Chief Clerk for engrossment.